Friday
Keeping Your Research Alive,
Friday, 9:30 a.m. to 10:50 a.m., organized by Brian Birgen,
Wartburg College, William M. Higdon, University of Indianapolis,
and James E. Hamblin, Shippensburg University. Aimed
at new Ph.D.'s and the young at mathematical heart, this panel will
discuss approaches to maintaining an active research agenda in the
midst of overwhelming teaching and service demands. Methods for
getting undergraduates involved in research and reinvigorating a
dormant research agenda will also be discussed. Panelists include
Jean Bee Chan, Sonoma State University, Michael J. Dorff,
Brigham Young University, and Asamoah Nkwanta, Morgan State
University. The session is cosponsored by The Young Mathematicians
Network and Project NExT.
National Science Foundation Programs Supporting
Learning and Teaching in the Mathematical Sciences, Friday,
9:30 a.m. to 10:50 a.m., organized by Camille McKayle, NSF/Directorate
for Education and Human Resources, Lloyd E. Douglas, NSF/Division
of Mathematical Sciences, Elizabeth J. Teles and Lee L.
Zia, NSF/Division of Undergraduate Education, and David C.
Royster, NSF. A number of NSF divisions offer a variety of grant
programs that support innovations in learning and teaching in the
mathematical sciences. These programs will be discussed along with
examples of successful projects. Anticipated budget highlights and
other new initiatives for the next fiscal year will also be presented.
TOP
Ethics in the Mathematical Sciences,
Friday, 2:15 p.m. to 3:35 p.m., organized by Susan C. Geller,
Texas A&M University. The MAA is in the process of writing ethics
guidelines. This panel will present the guidelines of some other
organizations in the mathematical sciences and a draft version of
guidelines for the MAA. Then there will be an open discussion about
the draft. We really want input from a diverse group so please come
and help. Panelists include Donald L. Bentley, Pomona College,
John D. Fulton, Clemson University, Linda Keen, Herbert
H. Lehman College CUNY, and Henry Walker, Grinnell University.
The session is sponsored by the MAA Committee on the Profession.
Young Mathematicians'
Network/MAA-Project NExT Poster Session, Friday, 2:15 p.m. to
4:15 p.m., organized by Kevin E. Charlwood, Washburn University,
and Michael Axtell, Wabash College. Junior mathematicians
who are no more than five years beyond their Ph.D. are invited by
Project NExT and the Young Mathematicians' Network to submit abstracts
for the session. The poster size will be 48" (length) by 36" (height).
Posters and materials for posting pages on the posters will be provided
onsite. Applications should be submitted to Kevin Charlwood, kevin.charlwood@washburn.edu,
or Michael Axtell, axtellm@wabash.edu , by Friday, December 8, 2006.
TOP
The Role of Assessment in Helping Students
Learn, Friday, 2:15 p.m. to 3:35 p.m., organized by Catherine
M. Murphy, Purdue University Calumet, and Daniel P. Maki,
Indiana University. Assessment of student learning in courses and
programs focuses on outcomes not inputs. What is needed for an effective
assessment process that helps us accomplish our goals and provides
evidence of student learning required by accrediting bodies? The
panelists, who have many years of experience working with assessment
of students' learning outcomes in the mathematical sciences, will
provide overviews and models addressing the issues raised by the
previous question. Specific examples will be given. Come! Ask questions,
share successes! Panelists include Bernard L. Madison, University
of Arkansas, Fayetteville, William A. Marion Jr., Valparaiso
University, and Barbara Moskal, Colorado School of Mines.
Preparing Majors for the Nonacademic Workforce:
Projects and Internships in Applied Mathematics and Statistics,
Friday, 2:15 p.m. to 3:35 p.m., organized by Thomas L. Moore,
Grinnell College, and Harriet S. Pollatsek, Mount Holyoke
College. More than 90% of mathematical sciences majors go directly
into the workforce after graduation. In the Curriculum Guide
2004, CUPM recommends that, "in addition to the general recommendations
for majors, programs for students preparing to enter the nonacademic
workforce should include a project involving contemporary applications
of mathematics or an internship in a related work area." (In the
Guide, "mathematics" is shorthand for the mathematical sciences,
including statistics.) This panel, moderated by Thomas L. Moore,
will include representatives of departments at varied institutions
offering their majors interesting and valuable opportunities that
satisfy this recommendation. Panelists include Matt Richey,
St. Olaf College; Nagambal Shah, Spelman College; and Suzanne
Weekes, Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The session is sponsored
by CUPM and the SIGMAA on Statistics Education.
TOP
How to Interview
for a Job in the Mathematical Sciences, Friday, 3:50 p.m. to
5:10 p.m., organized by David C. Manderscheid, University
of Iowa. This session is aimed at Ph.D. students and recent Ph.D.'s.
An overview of the employment process will be given with ample opportunity
for participants to ask questions. The emphasis will be on the portion
of the employment process from interviewing through accepting an
offer. Questions that will be addressed include: How do employers
conduct interviews? How can you best prepare for these interviews?
How do employers choose to whom they will make offers? How do you
negotiate once you have an offer? How do you choose among competing
offers? Panelists will include Allen Butler, Daniel H. Wagner
Associates, Inc., Sharon M. Clarke, Pepperdine University,
James H. Freeman, Cornell College, David T. Kung,
St. Mary's College of Maryland, and David C. Manderscheid.
The session is cosponsored by the MAA Committee on Graduate Students
and The Young Mathematicians Network.
TOP
Mathematics and Mathematicians in Emerging
Nations, Friday, 3:50 p.m. to 5:40 p.m., organized by M.
Leigh Lunsford, Longwood University, and Lisa Elaine Marano,
West Chester University of Pennsylvania. Have you ever wondered
about how mathematics is taught, perceived, and practiced in emerging
countries? An "emerging" country will be rather loosely defined
for this discussion and will thus include China and other Asian
countries as well as South American and African nations. What can
we learn from these countries and what do we have to offer? Panelists
will discuss their first-hand experiences with research mathematicians
as well as mathematics educators in emerging nations. Opportunities
for interaction with mathematicians from these countries will also
be discussed. This panel discussion is sponsored by the MAA Study
Abroad Tours Subcommittee. Panelists include Joel K. Haack,
University of Northern Iowa, Aihua Li, Montclair State University,
Kate McGivney, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania, Claudio
H. Morales, University of Alabama, Huntsville, and Miranda
I. Teboh-Ewungkem, Lafayette College.
Current Issues in Actuarial Science Education,
Friday, 4:45 p.m. to 6:45 p.m., organized by Robert E. Buck,
Slippery Rock University, Bettye Anne Case, Florida State
University, Matthew J. Hassett, Arizona State University,
and Steve Paris, Florida State University. A diverse group
of working actuaries, publishers, and actuarial educators bring
new information from professional society committees, specialized
publications initiatives, and academic department experience. The
pace of change in the profession is faster than in most academic
areas, and the session helps faculty adjust as quickly as possible
not only to educate their students generally, but give the students
good professional information and to determine upcoming curriculum
change which may be necessary.
TOP
Saturday
Euler's Continuing Influence, Saturday,
8:30 a.m. to 9:50 a.m., organized by Edward Sandifer, Western
Connecticut State University. On the occasion of the 300th anniversary
of Euler's birth, this panel looks at the influence Euler's mathematical
work has had on not only the course of mathematics over the years,
but also his influence in areas such as science, religion, philosophy,
and education. Scholars with backgrounds in Euler will give short
presentations then the presenters will answer questions from the
audience. This panel will complement the MAA Short Course on Euler.
Panelists will include William W. Dunham, Muhlenberg College,
Euler's mathematics; Charles R. Hampton, College of
Wooster, Philosophy and religion; and June E. Barrow-Green,
The Open University, Education.
TOP
Strategic Thinking About Non-Ladder Faculty,
Saturday, 9:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m., organized by Judith L. Baxter,
University of Illinois at Chicago, Kevin E. Charlwood, Washburn
University, and Natasha M. Speer, Michigan State University.
Departments of mathematics are under increasing pressure to teach
more of our courses using nontenure-track faculty. This creates
concerns on many levels. From the perspective of the tenure-track
faculty, is the tenure system being eroded? Are our courses being
taught well? Are the nontenure-track faculty being properly supervised?
From the perspective of the nontenure-track faculty, are they treated
well by the department? Are they included in textbook decisions
and exam committees for the courses that they teach, as well as
in departmental activities and seminars? Do they have health insurance
and/or other benefits? Do they have to cobble together a job by
teaching at several different institutions? Panelists will include:
Charles Hale, Cal State University Pomona; Penelope Kirby,
Florida State University; Fred Peskoff, Borough of Manhattan
Community College/CUNY; and Diane Hermann, University of
Chicago.The session is sponsored by the Joint AMS/MAA Committee
on Teaching Assistants and Part-Time Instructors (TA/PTI).
Highlighting MAA/Tensor Foundation Projects, Saturday, 9:00
a.m. to 11:00 a.m., organized by Elizabeth G. Yanik, Emporia
State University, Jennifer Hontz, Meredith College, and Kathleen
A. Sullivan, Seattle University. This poster session is designed
to showcase successful programs which have been supported by MAA/Tensor
Foundation grants. The objectives of the MAA/Tensor Foundation Program
are to encourage mathematics faculty to develop projects to
increase the participation of women in mathematics; and provide
support to project directors. The participants in such programs
range in age from university women to high school and middle school
girls. It is expected that posters representing a wide variety of
programs will be displayed. Possible programming formats include
after school clubs, special conferences, mentoring programs, and
summer camps. Those who are in the process of constructing an outreach
program are especially encouraged to attend this session to acquire
valuable insights and tips for designing and implementing a mathematics
outreach project. Applications should be submitted to Betsy Yanik,
yanikeli@emporia.edu by
Friday, December 8, 2006.
Using Student Portfolios for Assessment,
Saturday, 10:00 a.m. to 11:20 a.m., organized by Alex J. Heidenberg
and Michael D. Phillips, U.S. Military Academy. In its simplest
form, assessment is the process of gathering information about student
learning. More important than collecting and analyzing this information
is searching for meaning with respect to the learning goals and
acting on what is discovered. When the course ends and we have finished
with our assessment tools, we need to reflect back on our goals.
Are the goals appropriate? Did we meet the course goals? What changes,
if any, do we need to make to improve the educational experience?
How do we know that we have adequately captured student learning?
An assessment program should be comprehensive and multi-faceted.
Many assessment programs use student portfolios to capture elements
of student growth and learning. Now that portfolios are in vogue,
how do you implement this assessment strategy effectively? The purpose
of this session is to bring together a panel to discuss issues involved
with using portfolios as an assessment tool. Panelists include Connie
S. Schrock, Emporia State University, Dennis Kern, Texas
A&M University at Texarkana, Cathy Liebars, College of
New Jersey, and Archie Wilmer III, U.S. Military Academy.
TOP
Proposal Writing Workshop for Grant Applications
to the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education, Saturday, 10:30
a.m. to 11:50 a.m., organized by Elizabeth J. Teles and Lee
L. Zia, National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate
Education. Presenters will describe the general NSF grant proposal
process and consider particular details relevant to programs in
the Division of Undergraduate Education. This interactive session
will feature a series of "read/think/share/report" exercises built
around a series of short excerpts from sample proposals.
Engaging Students in Research, Clubs, Student
Chapters, and Internships, Saturday, 1:00 p.m. to 2:20 p.m.,
organized by Kay B. Somers, Moravian University, and Jody
Sorenson, Augsburg College. The panelists' discussion will focus
on ways in which we can engage students in a variety of learning
activities outside the usual classroom experiences. The four speakers
will share their experiences and describe activities that allow
students to gain valuable mathematics-related research and work
experience, communicate mathematics, build community among their
peers, and have fun. These activities include independent and group
research experiences, student conferences, and MAA Student Chapter
events. In addition, panelists will discuss internships, field study
projects, and service projects. Panelists include Gary Gordon,
Lafayette College, Deanna B. Haunsperger, Carleton College,
Angela Spalsbury, Youngstown State University, and Richard
A. Zang, University of New Hampshire, Manchester. The session
is sponsored by the MAA Committee on Undergraduate Student Activities
and Chapters (CUSAC).
TOP
Placement: Friend or Foe?, Saturday,
1:00 p.m. to 2:20 p.m., organized by Susan L. Forman, Bronx
Community College, Reginald K. U. Luke, Middlesex County
College, and Stephen B. Rodi, Austin Community College. Accurately
placing students in a first mathematics course in college is a perennial
problem for mathematics departments, whether the placement is a
choice between precalculus and calculus I or between elementary
and intermediate algebra. The purpose of this panel is to share
the expertise of three individuals who have been deeply involved
in placement issues, either on their own campuses or in the larger
context of articulation among area schools. They will alert you
to unexpected stumbling blocks in the placement process and share
their thoughts on placement tools and procedures that have worked
for them. They also will address issues such as: What kinds of and
how much information should departments provide incoming students
concerning the placement procedures they will encounter? How do
departments deal with discrepancies between placement scores and
a student's previous academic background? How can a department track
the effectiveness of its placement program? What are the strengths
and weaknesses of various placement instruments or strategies? Ample
time will be allowed to address additional questions from the floor.
Panelists include Geoffrey Akst, Borough of Manhattan Community
College, Steve Newman, Northern Kentucky University, and
Gordon S. Woodward, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The session
is co-sponsored by the MAA Committee on Two-Year Colleges and the
MAA Committee on Articulation and Placement.
Reshaping Undergraduate Mathematics for
Biology-Related Disciplines: Ideas and Innovations, Saturday,
1:00 p.m. to 2:20 p.m., organized by Jenna P. Carpenter,
Louisiana Tech University. The mathematical needs of biology-related
disciplines have undergone dramatic changes in recent years, spurring
the need to reshape the traditional undergraduate mathematics training
for these majors to focus on topics such as data analysis, modeling
and selected topics from calculus and beyond. This session will
feature four successful projects featured in the MAA publication
Math and Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines to explore
how they are meeting these needs. Panelists will summarize their
projects, highlighting challenges and successes. This will be followed
by a question-and-answer session to allow interested attendees the
opportunity to explore how they might implement similar learning
experiences at their own institutions. Examination copies and/or
handouts of project overviews, sample curricular materials, websites
and other dissemination products will be made available for attendees.
Panelists will include Eric S. Marland, Appalachian State
University, Debra L. Hydorn, University of Mary Washington,
Ami Radunskaya, Pomona College, and Kathy Taylor,
Duquesne University. The session is sponsored by the MAA CUPM Subcommittee
on Curriculum Renewal Across the First Two Years (CRAFTY).
TOP
Projects Supported by the NSF Division
of Undergraduate Education, Saturday, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.,
organized by Jon W. Scott, Montgomery Community College.
This poster session will feature principal investigators (PIs) presenting
progress and outcomes from various projects funded totally by the
NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) or cooperatively with
other NSF divisions. This format will permit ample opportunity for
attendees to engage in small group discussions with the PIs and
to network with each other. Information about presenters and their
projects will appear in the program.
Electronic Student Assessment Systems,
Saturday 2:30 p.m. to 3:50 p.m., organized by Michael D. Hvidsten,
Gustavus Adolphus College, and Bruce W. Yoshiwara, Los Angeles
Pierce College. Panelists will discuss the current state and the
possible future of various electronic/online student assessment
systems, such as ALEKS, MyMathLab, and Thomson Now! Topics of discussion
will include problem/question/task types, product costs, hardware/software
requirements, ease of use, integration with textbooks, and data
on the impact on learning. Panelists include David P. Bell,
Florida Community College, Michael E. Gage, University of
Rochester, Jolene Rhodes, Valencia Community College, and
Phoebe B. Rouse, Louisiana State University. The session
is sponsored by the MAA Committee on Technologies in Mathematics
Education (CTME).
TOP
Sunday
Calculus, Liberal Arts, and Quantitative
Literacy, Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m., organized by Richard
A. Gillman, Valparaiso University. In a recent survey of quantitative
literacy programs, three points became clear: (a) there seems to
be a consensus on the requisite mathematical skills, (b) it is assumed
that any student taking calculus becomes quantitatively literate,
and (c) there is no clear role for the traditional liberal arts
"great ideas" course in QL. Starting with the consensus answer to
the first point, this panel will begin a discussion of the following
questions: Are calculus students quantitatively literate? Can a
liberal arts course teach quantitative literacy? In John Paulo's
initial works on numeracy, he suggests that many scientists are
quantitatively illiterate; are we addressing this concern? Similarly,
does a course in the history of math or on fun geometric topics
prepare a student to deal with their everyday world? The panelists
will respond to these questions from their various perspectives
in their presentations and in response to the audience's questions.
Panelists include William E. Briggs, University of Colorado,
Denver, Deborah Hughes-Hallett, University of Arizona, Michael
Starbird, University of Texas at Austin, and Richard A. Gillman.
TOP
The Top Ten Things You Should Know if You
Intend to Implement the Standards of Beyond Crossroads,
Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m., organized by Richelle (Rikki)
Blair, Lakeland Community College. The American Mathematical
Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC) unveiled its second standards
document Beyond Crossroads and its accompanying electronic
resources in November 2006. Beyond Crossroads presents a
new set of implementation standards building on the standards for
intellectual development, content, and pedagogy from the 1995 Crossroads.
The standards address student learning and the learning environment,
assessment of student learning, curriculum and program development,
instructional strategies, and professionalism. In this session panelists
will discuss implementing standards-based mathematics teaching and
the need to embrace change and continuous improvement as professionals.
They will give examples of how these standards and accompanying
electronic resources can be used to improve student learning. Panelists
include Kathy Mowers, Owensboro Community and Technical College,
Robert L. Kimball Jr., Wake Technical Community College,
Bradford I. Chin, West Valley College, and Rikki Blair.
The "Bridge" Course, Sunday, 1:00 p.m.
to 2:20 p.m., organized by George R. Exner, Bucknell University.
The "bridge" or "transitions" course has become a standard gateway
course in the undergraduate mathematics major in the past decade
and a half. However, the course and its issues remain relatively
unstudied by mathematics education researchers; further, those teaching
the course are largely unaware of what relevant research there is.
As well, these courses tend to be developed in isolation, with little
cross-fertilization from successful versions at other institutions,
and we lack resources analyzing or recording goals, approaches,
and techniques. The panel will consider some directions for research
to engage both researchers and practitioners, and widen the conversation
to the audience to jump start ongoing activities. How can we study
the course in ways both feasible and of interest to all concerned
(using the complementary strengths of researchers and teachers),
communicate findings usefully and broadly, assemble and publish
both best practice and research based techniques, and find support
for this effort? The session will be moderated by George R. Exner.
Panelists include David M. Bressoud, Macalester College,
Amy Cohen, Rutgers University, Barbara E. Edwards,
Oregon State University, and Annie Selden, New Mexico State
University. The session is sponsored by the MAA Committee on the
Undergraduate Program in Mathematics (CUPM).
Attracting Underrepresented Students to
Graduate Study Through Research, Sunday, 2:30 p.m. to 3:50 p.m.,
organized by William Hawkins Jr., MAA and the University
of the District of Columbia, and Robert E. Megginson, University
of Michigan. The MAA supported student research programs consisting
of small research teams of a faculty member and four minority undergraduates
at twelve sites in the summers of 2005 and 2006 with funds from
NSF, NSA, and the Moody's Foundation. An initiative of the MAA National
Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program (NREUP), this is
one of several efforts to attract underrepresented students to graduate
study through research. Carlos Castillo-Chavezo, Arizona
State University; Dennis Davenport, Miami University of Ohio,
Lloyd E. Douglas, NSF, Herbert A. Medina, Loyola Marymount
University, Ivelisse M. Rubio, University of Puerto Rico,
Michelle D. Wagner, NSA, and Robert Megginson will
discuss their programs to address this issue of national concern.
There will be ample time for questions.
TOP
Monday
Algebra: Gateway to a Technological Future,
Monday, 9:30 a.m. to 10:50 a.m., organized by Michael Pearson,
MAA. There is widespread concern that the U.S. is losing its competitive
edge in areas of research and innovation that are critical to our
economic well-being. The National Mathematics Advisory Panel is
already working to identify ways to improve the mathematical education
of students in K to 12 in order to better prepare them to pursue
more advanced topics, and in particular will offer suggestions to
improve preparation for and success in algebra. The NSF has supported
projects designed to improve student learning of algebra at all
levels, ranging from studies of cognitive issues in pre-algebra
to abstract algebra for teachers. Now is a good time to take stock
of past efforts and look toward the future. In November 2006 the
MAA will bring together representatives from mathematics and mathematics
education from across the entire K to 16 spectrum to survey what
has been learned about algebra and to identify common principles
that can serve as models for improvement. This session is a preliminary
report on the project.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics in a
Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) Enriched Environment: College Algebra
to Real Analysis, Monday 9:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m., organized
by Wade Ellis, Jr., West Valley College. Computer Algebra
Systems (CAS) have been available for nearly half a century. Many
secondary school and college mathematics textbooks contain problems
that require the use of CAS, but few courses are constructed with
the use of a CAS as an integral part of teaching, learning, understanding,
and doing mathematics. This panel will give an overview and examples
of such uses in mathematics courses from college algebra to real
analysis. Panelists will include William C. Bauldry, Appalachian
State University; and Wade Ellis, Jr.
Knowing Mathematics for Teaching: Issues in Assessment and Teacher
Preparation, Monday, 1:00 p.m. to 2:20 p.m., organized by Joan
Ferrini-Mundy and Raven McCrory, Michigan State University.
Interest in teachers knowledge for teaching mathematics has
grown in recent years, prompted by the CBMS report The Mathematical
Education of Teachers; the National Academies Adding it Up; and
the disappointing results from national and international assessments
of student achievement in mathematics. It is widely believed that
teachers mathematical knowledge is an important factor in
their ability to promote student learning, but the parameters of
that knowledge are not well understood. Recent research at Michigan
State University and elsewhere has looked at this problem in new
ways, attempting to develop systematic approaches both to preparing
teachers to teach mathematics and to assessing teachers mathematical
knowledge. In this session, we present methods and results from
five projects at Michigan State University that are investigating
these issues: Knowing Mathematics for Teaching Algebra Project,
Joan Ferrini-Mundy; The Mathematical Education of Elementary
Teachers Project, Raven McCrory; Teachers for
a New Era, Sharon Senk; Preliminary Teacher Education
Study, William Schmidt; PROM/SE Math Science
Partnership, Gail Burrill. For each project, a short
summary of methods and results to date will be presented, followed
by comments from discussants and questions and feedback from the
audience.
MathNerds, Moore Method, and Mathematics Education: What do
they have in common?, Monday, 1:00 p.m. to 2:20 p.m., organized
by W. Ted Mahavier, Lamar University, and Laurie O. Cavey,
James Madison University, Through support from the Educational Advancement
Foundation, the Meadows Foundation, and the Texas Education Agency,
MathNerds has created custom software to link university mathematics
education classes with school districts in a way to facilitate training
future teachers in the pedagogy of inquiry-based instruction which
is the heart of the Moore Method and the MathNerds philosophy. School
district students submit questions through the MathNerds system
which are routed to students in university classes. These students
respond under the guidance of both a mathematics educator and a
mathematician, thereby addressing precisely the types of questions
that their future students may ask. By learning the MathNerds philosophy
for responding to questions, future teachers learn strategies that
encourage students to develop deeper understanding of the underlying
mathematical principles, thus enabling the students to become better
problem solvers. Panelists will include: Terry McCabe, Texas
State University; G. Edgar Parker, James Madison University;
Hiroko Warshauer, Texas State University; Max Warshauer,
Texas State University; Alexander White, Texas State University;
and Laurie O. Cavey
TOP
|